Categories: Sports

Ben Duckett’s 105 vs Pakistan: England restricted to 241 in ODI Tri-Series 2026

Key takeaways:
  • Ben Duckett scored 105 for England against Pakistan in an ODI played in the ODI Tri-Series 2026.
  • Duckett's innings was described as a brilliant century and the stand-out feature of England's innings.
  • England collapsed early and were restricted to 241 despite Duckett's hundred.
  • Pakistan's Afridi took a four-wicket haul — a four-for — that hobbled England.
  • The exact date, venue, third team of the tri-series, and the match result were not stated in the reported headlines.

Ben Duckett scored a brilliant ODI century — 105 against Pakistan — but it was the only stand-out feature of an England innings that were restricted to 241. The match was a Pakistan-England one-day international within the ODI Tri-Series 2026, and it was defined by an England early collapse plus a four-wicket haul from Pakistan’s Afridi.

Despite Duckett’s individual effort, Pakistan’s bowlers made sure the total stayed modest, and the headlines do not state a result. Here is everything the match reports do tell us, along with useful background on the player and the format.

What happened in Ben Duckett’s innings against Pakistan?

Ben Duckett played a brilliant one-day International century against Pakistan, scoring 105 runs, as reported by Sky Sports and Cricbuzz. Cricinfo described his knock as ‘the stand-out feature in England’s innings’, which tells you how rare and valuable it was. Duckett batted after England’s early collapse, meaning he arrived at the crease under pressure, absorbed the new-ball phase and kept England’s hopes alive through clean strokeplay. His 105 was the anchor that stopped the innings from unravelling completely.

How did England’s early collapse shape the innings?

According to Sky Sports, Duckett’s century came after England’s early collapse, meaning England lost wickets quickly at the start of their innings. That early damage forced Duckett to rebuild alone for long periods, and it helps explain why his knock stood out so clearly: when he batted through the hardest phases, runs were scarce around him. The eventual total of 241 — with Duckett contributing 105 of those runs — underlines how much of England’s batting effort rested on a single pair of shoulders.

Who took the key wickets for Pakistan?

Pakistan’s Afridi was the bowler who did the most damage, claiming a four-wicket haul — a ‘four-for’, in cricket shorthand. Cricinfo’s headline put it directly: ‘Afridi four-for hobbles England despite Duckett hundred.’ The four-for meant Pakistan removed a large chunk of the England batting line-up around Duckett, ensuring his century was not enough to turn the innings around.

What was England’s final total against Pakistan?

England were restricted to 241 in their innings, according to The Cricketer. Simple arithmetic shows how much Duckett carried the batting: with his 105 taken out, the other ten England batters combined for only 136 runs. For a full 50-over one-day innings, that is a low collective contribution, and it reflects both the early collapse and sustained pressure from Afridi and his Pakistan colleagues.

What do the match reports say? A summary of the headlines

Reported factSource
Duckett’s century was the stand-out feature of England’s inningsCricinfo
Duckett’s ODI century came after England’s early collapseSky Sports
Pakistan restricted England to 241 despite Duckett’s centuryThe Cricketer
Afridi’s four-for hobbled England despite Duckett’s hundredCricinfo
Duckett scored 105 against Pakistan in the ODI Tri-Series 2026Cricbuzz

When and where was the match played?

The only scheduling detail in the headlines is the series name: the ODI Tri-Series 2026, as identified in Cricbuzz’s report. The precise date, the venue and the identity of the third competing team were not given in the headlines reviewed here, so those details remain unknown and should not be assumed. A tri-series, as the name suggests, normally features three international teams, but only Pakistan and England are named in these reports.

What does ‘Afridi four-for’ actually mean?

In cricket, a ‘four-for’ is a four-wicket haul — the bowler dismissed four opposition batters in a match. For pace or spin bowlers alike, a four-for in a 50-over game is considered a match-defining effort, because removing four batters breaks partnerships and drags the run-rate down at crucial stages. In this match, Afridi’s four-for was decisive enough to be named alongside Duckett’s century in Cricinfo’s headlines.

Who is Ben Duckett?

Ben Duckett is an England international cricketer and a left-handed professional batter who has represented his country across formats, including Test cricket and the shorter white-ball game. He is regarded around the game as an attacking, instinctive player, which fits the description of a brilliant century from Sky Sports. His value with the bat in one-day cricket was on clear display against Pakistan.

Did England win or lose the match?

The headlines do not state the result of the game. What they report is a decisive bowling contribution from Pakistan — Afridi’s four-for — on a day when England’s batting collapsed early and recovered only through Duckett’s 105. Those details suggest Pakistan dominated proceedings, but without an officially reported outcome the result cannot be confirmed from these sources.

What happens next for England and Duckett?

That too remains unclear from the reports available; the headlines cover a single Pakistan-England match only. What can be said is that Duckett will hope to reproduce the form of his 105, while England’s middle order will want to put the early collapse behind them before the next round of the ODI Tri-Series 2026.

Why did Duckett’s century matter so much to England’s total?

Cricket totals rarely lie, and the arithmetic here is striking: remove Duckett’s 105 from England’s 241 and the other ten batters manage only 136 runs between them. That works out at barely one run for every two balls they faced, which gives a clear sense of how much of England’s batting effort rested on one innings. A score below 200 was a realistic threat once the early collapse had done its damage, and Duckett’s hundred was the reason England stayed above that line. In a 50-over format, totals around the 240 mark can still be competitive on helpful pitches, or chaseable but awkward on flat ones, so keeping the total respectable mattered as much as the personal milestone.

What is an ODI tri-series, and how is it played?

A tri-series is a one-day tournament contested by three international teams. Each side plays the others several times — often five or seven matches apiece, depending on the series agreement — and the final standings are decided by results from that round-robin group. The two best-performing teams typically meet in a final, although some editions simply crown the table topper as champion. The ODI Tri-Series 2026 identified in the reports follows that template, with Pakistan and England named among the three competing sides; only those two were mentioned in the headlines reviewed here, so the identity of the third team should not be assumed. What the format guarantees is that every match feeds directly into the standings, meaning a collapsed start to the tournament — like England’s here — carries consequences for who qualifies or where teams sit going into the final rounds.

Frequently asked questions

How many wickets did Afridi take against England? Afridi claimed four wickets — a ‘four-for’ — and Cricinfo credited that effort with hobbling England’s innings despite Duckett’s hundred.

How many runs did the other England batters score? With England totalling 241 and Duckett contributing 105, the remaining ten batters combined for just 136 runs.

Which outlets reported on the match? Cricinfo, Sky Sports, Cricbuzz and The Cricketer all covered the game, focusing on Duckett’s century, the early collapse, Afridi’s four-wicket haul and the final total.

Did the reports settle the result of the match? No — none of the headlines reviewed state an outcome. England’s low total and Pakistan’s dominant bowling performance suggest Pakistan held the upper hand, but without a reported result the outcome cannot be confirmed from these sources.

What comes next for Duckett and England? The reports cover a single match only, and therefore say nothing about subsequent fixtures. The expectation is that Duckett will carry the momentum of his 105 into the next game, while England’s middle order aims to limit

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

How many runs did Ben Duckett score against Pakistan?

Ben Duckett scored 105 runs for England against Pakistan in a one-day international played under the banner of the ODI Tri-Series 2026. His century was described as brilliant by Sky Sports and as the stand-out feature in England's innings by Cricinfo.

What was England's total against Pakistan?

England were restricted to 241 in their innings against Pakistan, according to The Cricketer. Duckett's 105 meant the other ten England batters contributed only 136 runs between them, reflecting an early collapse and sustained pressure from Pakistan's bowlers, including Afridi's four-wicket haul.

Who took four wickets for Pakistan?

Pakistan's Afridi took a four-wicket haul, known as a four-for, against England. Cricinfo reported that Afridi's four-for hobbled England despite Duckett's hundred, making him the standout bowler of the match. The headlines name only 'Afridi' and do not give a first name.

When and where was the match played?

The headlines identify the contest only as part of the ODI Tri-Series 2026, as shown in Cricbuzz's coverage. The exact date, the venue, and the identity of the third team in the tri-series were not stated in the available reports, so those scheduling details remain unconfirmed.

Did England win or lose the match?

The reported headlines do not state a result. They record Duckett's 105, England's total of 241, and Afridi's four-for — details that point to Pakistan dominating the day — but the final outcome cannot be confirmed from these sources alone.

Arjun Nair

Arjun Nair writes about technology, artificial intelligence, gadgets, apps and emerging digital trends. He focuses on explaining new technologies in a simple, practical way and helping readers understand how they could affect everyday life.

Recent Posts

Man Utd vs Bournemouth: Bruno Fernandes benched, Carrick promises change

Key takeaways:Manchester United captain Bruno Fernandes was dropped from the Man Utd vs Bournemouth starting…

6 minutes ago

Deepti Sharma Scores Century as India Women Post 328/6 vs Zimbabwe in 2nd ODI

Key takeaways:Deepti Sharma scored a century in the India Women vs Zimbabwe Women 2nd ODI,…

36 minutes ago

Inter vs Fiorentina Preview: Match Predictions, Line-Ups, and Live Stream Options

Key takeaways:Goal.com match predictions highlight forward Marcus Thuram as a key driver expected to power…

1 hour ago

Churchill Brothers vs Punjab FC: ISL 2026-27 Preview, Stats & Head-to-Head

Key takeaways:Churchill Brothers are seeking redemption and looking to bounce back at home in their…

2 hours ago

Jintimani Kalita Makes India Women ODI Debut Against Zimbabwe: Profile, Career, and Call-Up Details

Key takeaways:Jintimani Kalita is a 22-year-old all-rounder who made her ODI debut for India Women…

3 hours ago

Joe Root Makes History as First England Batter to Reach 8,000 ODI Runs

Key takeaways:Joe Root became the first England batter in cricket history to reach 8,000 One…

3 hours ago