There is no confirmed evidence that Virat Kohli or Anushka Sharma received Rs 50 million (approximately Rs 5 crore) to visit Premanand Maharaj’s ashram; the claim appears only in recent headlines and has sparked public debate.
The three most‑cited news pieces all focus on a single allegation: that a famous cricket star and a Bollywood actress were paid large sums to attend the ashram of Premanand Maharaj. Gulf News frames the story as a question – “Did Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma receive Rs 50 million to visit Premanand Maharaj’s ashram?” IBTimes India uses a similar tone, stating “Virat Kohli got paid Rs 5 crore to visit Premanand Maharaj’s ashram? [Watch]”. Asianet Newsable expands the narrative, asking “Who Is Premanand Maharaj? Why Virat Kohli’s Rs. 5 Crore Claim Has Sparked Controversy”. None of the headlines provide a definitive answer, only a prompt for investigation.
Premanand Maharaj is a spiritual figure who runs an ashram that claims to offer meditation, yoga, and guidance on personal development. Public information about his early life, official certifications, or the size of his organization is limited, and the headlines do not disclose these details. As a result, readers are left without a clear picture of his background beyond the fact that he attracts high‑profile visitors.
The controversy stems from three factors. First, the alleged amount – Rs 5 crore (about US $600,000) is unusually high for a single visit, prompting questions about the nature of the transaction. Second, the involvement of two of India’s most recognizable celebrities – Virat Kohli, a world‑renowned cricketer, and Anushka Sharma, a leading film actress – adds a sensational element that amplifies media attention. Third, the lack of any official statement from the celebrities or their representatives leaves the story open to speculation, which fuels further debate on social platforms.
Only the amounts mentioned in the headlines are known: Rs 50 million (or Rs 5 crore) and the suggestion that the money was paid to Virat Kohli, with Anushka Sharma possibly included. No source, contract, bank record, or receipt has been publicly disclosed. The articles do not specify when the payment supposedly occurred, who the payer was, or whether the money was a donation, fee, or sponsorship.
| Source | Claim | Amount Mentioned |
|---|---|---|
| Gulf News | Question whether both celebrities received money | Rs 50 million |
| IBTimes India | States Virat Kohli was paid to visit | Rs 5 crore |
| Asianet Newsable | Explores why the claim sparked controversy | Rs 5 crore |
Publicly, neither Virat Kohli nor Anushka Sharma has issued a statement confirming or denying the payment. Media reports do not cite any interviews, social‑media posts, or legal filings from the celebrities that would clarify their position. Consequently, the article must note that their responses remain unknown.
For everyday readers, the story serves as a reminder that viral headlines can spread quickly even when they lack verifiable facts. The mention of a large sum of money and two beloved public figures can influence opinions about spirituality, celebrity endorsement, and financial transparency. Without corroborating evidence, the public should remain cautious, avoid sharing unverified claims, and seek information from multiple reputable sources before forming judgments.
Reputable news organisations usually label such stories as “allegations” or “questions” until they can obtain proof. The three headlines examined here all use phrasing that signals uncertainty – “Did…?”, “Got paid…?”, and “Why…Has Sparked Controversy”. This wording complies with journalistic standards that avoid presenting speculation as fact. However, the repeated circulation of the same claim across different platforms can create the illusion of confirmation, which is why critical evaluation remains essential.
Fans should first check the original source of the claim – is it a press release, a court document, or a reputable news article? Cross‑checking with the celebrity’s official social‑media accounts can reveal whether they have addressed the issue. Searching for legal filings or statements from the ashram’s management can also provide clarity. Finally, relying on fact‑checking websites that cite primary documents helps separate genuine news from speculation.
If a payment of this magnitude were made for a spiritual visit, it could raise questions about endorsement regulations, tax implications, and the authenticity of the ashram’s services. Indian law requires disclosure when public figures receive compensation for promotional activities, but the headlines do not confirm whether any such disclosure was made. The absence of official documentation means the legal status of the alleged transaction cannot be determined from the available sources.
Readers should look for primary evidence such as official statements, court filings, or verified financial disclosures. Trusted news outlets may later publish follow‑up investigations that include interviews with the parties involved or independent audits of the ashram’s financial records. Until such sources appear, the claim remains unverified and should be treated as a rumor.
In summary, three recent headlines raise the question of whether Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma were paid Rs 5 crore (or Rs 50 million) to visit Premanand Maharaj’s ashram. No concrete evidence, dates, or official comments accompany these claims. The story highlights how high‑profile names can amplify unverified allegations, and it underscores the importance of waiting for corroborated information before drawing conclusions.
No public statement from Virat Kohli confirms or denies the alleged payment; media reports have not presented any direct comment from him.
The headlines refer to either Rs 50 million (approximately Rs 5 crore) or specifically Rs 5 crore as the alleged sum paid for the visit.
Premanand Maharaj is a spiritual leader who runs an ashram offering meditation and personal‑development programs, though detailed public information about his background is limited.
Look for official statements, court filings, or verified financial disclosures from the celebrities or the ashram; reputable fact‑checking sites can also help confirm or refute the rumor.
Key takeaways:Switzerland vs North Macedonia will be played on 6 October 2026 as part of the UEFA…
Key takeaways:England and Czechia meet in a UEFA Nations League 2026 match at Wembley, with…
Key takeaways:Croatia relies on Luka Modrić’s midfield leadership, as highlighted by the BBC.Spain’s "sweeping changes"…
Key takeaways:Aman Gandhi was called ‘namard’ (coward) by Mahi Vij on Bigg Boss 20.The comment was part of…
Key takeaways:Scotland faces Slovenia in a Nations League match on 06‑10‑2026 with live TV, radio,…
Key takeaways:World Space Week 2026 is officially themed "Rocket Revolution".The theme highlights rapid advances in…