(i) Case No. 81/2016 filed by CA Ranjan Sardana against M/s Cellular Operator Association of India, M/s Bharti Airtel Limited. and M/s Idea Cellular Limited.
(ii) Case No. 83/2016 filed by Mr. Kantilal Ambala Puj against Cellular Operation Association of India, Vodafone India Limited, Bharti Airtel Limited, Idea Cellular Limited, Telenor (India) Communication Private Limited, Videocon Telecommunication Limited, Aircel Limited and Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited.
(iii) Case No. 95/2016 filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. against Cellular Operators Association of India, Vodafone India Limited, Vodafone Mobile Services Limited, Vodafone Group PIC, Bharti Airtel Limited, Bharti Hexacom Limited and Idea Cellular Limited.
(iv) Case No.98/2016 filed by Shri C Shanmugam against Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, Department of Telecommunication, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and BSNL.
Under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, the CCI is mandated, inter-alia, to impose penalties and/or issue cease and desist orders in cases of unethical practices such as anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance.
Active Apparel Group Strengthens Lever Style’s Activewear CapabilitiesHONG KONG SAR - Media OutReach Newswire -…
HANOI, VIETNAM - Media OutReach Newswire - 17 December 2025 - VinSpeed High-Speed Railway Investment…
Hongkongers’ average monthly savings rise to a record HK$10,100, while parents with a habit of…
HONG KONG SAR - Media OutReach Newswire - 17 December 2025 - The 2025 Hong…
SINGAPORE - Media OutReach Newswire - 17 December 2025 - The team behind Casket Fairprice,…
Dedicated to Empowering Local Startups and Fostering Hong Kong’s I&T EcosystemHONG KONG SAR - Media…